Happy Easter Everyone

Just saw this for the first time last night on FOX NEWS.   It's a MUST SEE, especially on this joyous Easter holiday.  Turn up your sound.

What Difference Does It Make? ... I'll Tell You What Difference It Makes !

A LOT !   Especially if you value your freedoms, our country and our constitution!

Judge for yourself.

Click the following link for the details:

https://www.google.com/search?q=zeifman+fires+hillary+clinton&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

·         Whitewater & Rose Law Firm Missing Billing Records Coverup

·         1974 House Judiciary Committee Staff Misconduct

·         1978 - 1979 Futures Trading Irregularities

·         1996 - Bosnia Sniper Fire Claims

·         Benghazi Whitewash

Over the years, Hillary has dodged bullet after bullet by excuse and delay after excuse and obstruction.  The issue at this point is not whether she was in fact actually guilty of something but whether we, as a nation, can afford yet another president with a clear history of unethical and dishonest behavior and a penchant for dodging responsibility.

Eight years of Obama is more than enough!  We don’t need eight more with Hillary!

That's what difference it makes !

“We are now at the constitutional tipping point for our system.  If balance is to be reestablished, it must begin before this president leaves office and that will likely require every possible means to reassert legislative authority,”

Jonathan Turley - Professor of public interest law at George Washington University, Washington, D.C.

Protect C4 Free Speech

The Internal Revenue Service has quietly announced a new rule that strictly limits the ability of 501(c)(4), tax-exempt organizations from working on their core missions in the months leading up to federal, state, and local elections. The proposed regulations would prohibit these organizations from engaging in candidate-related political activity, which, by the proposed rule's definition, includes any mention of a candidate's name or political party even if presented in a non-political context. Further, organizations would have to ensure that any references to candidates in past communications are not publicly available, including online, during the pre-election window. These regulations would, in effect, prohibit organizations from providing the public with candidate comparisons and voting records, engaging in get-out-the-vote activities, or encouraging informed civic participation, among other activities. They would severely limit both the organizations' First Amendment free speech and the public's ability to hold elected officials accountable for their actions.

This will not apply to 501(c)5 labor unions and (c)6 trade associations: The proposed regulation does not apply to labor organizations, although the proposal states that the Administration is considering a regulation in this area.  Thus, a likely result is that a final rule will be promulgated further restricting non-profit speech and an activity long before any comparable regulation is promulgated on the activities of labor organizations.

See anything wrong about such action?

Are you willing to stand by and allow yet another “big government” attack on our constitutional rights?

I’m not and I’ve expressed my opinion to Regulations.gov     Please do so as well.

For additional information on this important issue -> Click here.

Click here for Tips On Submitting Effective Comments

Obama Does It Yet Again! - Outrageous!!

In August 2013 United States federal district judge Reed O’Connor in Dallas dismissed a lawsuit by ICE against President Obama’s policy to defer deportation for some young illegal Caribbean and other immigrants.

In his ruling, Judge O’Connor said the suit had been “likely to succeed on the merits of their claim that the Department of Homeland Security has implemented a program contrary to Congressional mandate” meaning DHS and president Obama did not have authority to interpret law in a manner contrary to that passed by Congress.

Now he has done it yet again! 

>Columnist Charles Krauthammer spoke recently on Bret Baier’s Fox News show about the breakdown of Constitutional order: “It’s not incompetence; it’s willful breaking of the constitutional order. Where in the constitution is a president allowed to alter a law 27 times after it’s been passed?”

Has President Obama OVERSTEPPED his Constitutional authority? Here is what a Georgetown Law Professor testified to earlier this week. 

It's high time the GOP got some spine and got this in front of the Supreme Court!

What's your opinion?

New Crop Of Bumper Stickers

Thanks to one of our Conservative Thinkers for these.

"Relocate To New York . . . Unless . . .

A current New York state ad being pushed by New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) invites businesses to relocate your business to the state of New York …

… unless you’re a conservative Republican!

If you are conservative Republican against abortion or homosexuality  … you have no place in the state (of New York).

Such hypocricy!

Think he’ll find many takers?