Thursday, February 27, 2014

“We are now at the constitutional tipping point for our system.  If balance is to be reestablished, it must begin before this president leaves office and that will likely require every possible means to reassert legislative authority,”


Jonathan Turley - Professor of public interest law at George Washington University, Washington, D.C.




Friday, February 14, 2014

Protect C4 Free Speech


The Internal Revenue Service has quietly announced a new rule that strictly limits the ability of 501(c)(4), tax-exempt organizations from working on their core missions in the months leading up to federal, state, and local elections. The proposed regulations would prohibit these organizations from engaging in candidate-related political activity, which, by the proposed rule's definition, includes any mention of a candidate's name or political party even if presented in a non-political context. Further, organizations would have to ensure that any references to candidates in past communications are not publicly available, including online, during the pre-election window. These regulations would, in effect, prohibit organizations from providing the public with candidate comparisons and voting records, engaging in get-out-the-vote activities, or encouraging informed civic participation, among other activities. They would severely limit both the organizations' First Amendment free speech and the public's ability to hold elected officials accountable for their actions.
This will not apply to 501(c)5 labor unions and (c)6 trade associations: The proposed regulation does not apply to labor organizations, although the proposal states that the Administration is considering a regulation in this area.  Thus, a likely result is that a final rule will be promulgated further restricting non-profit speech and an activity long before any comparable regulation is promulgated on the activities of labor organizations.

See anything wrong about such action?

Are you willing to stand by and allow yet another “big government” attack on our constitutional rights?

I’m not and I’ve expressed my opinion to Regulations.gov     Please do so as well.

For additional information on this important issue -> Click here.


Wednesday, February 12, 2014

Obama Does It Yet Again! - Outrageous!!

In August 2013 United States federal district judge Reed O’Connor in Dallas dismissed a lawsuit by ICE against President Obama’s policy to defer deportation for some young illegal Caribbean and other immigrants.
In his ruling, Judge O’Connor said the suit had been “likely to succeed on the merits of their claim that the Department of Homeland Security has implemented a program contrary to Congressional mandate meaning DHS and president Obama did not have authority to interpret law in a manner contrary to that passed by Congress.
Now he has done it yet again! 
>Columnist Charles Krauthammer spoke recently on Bret Baier’s Fox News show about the breakdown of Constitutional order: “It’s not incompetence; it’s willful breaking of the constitutional order. Where in the constitution is a president allowed to alter a law 27 times after it’s been passed?


Has President Obama OVERSTEPPED his Constitutional authority? Here is what a Georgetown Law Professor testified to earlier this week. 
It's high time the GOP got some spine and got this in front of the Supreme Court!
What's your opinion?

Monday, February 3, 2014

New Crop Of Bumper Stickers

Thanks to one of our Conservative Thinkers for these.