Sunday, June 10, 2012

Is the U. N. Really In Our Best Interest?



Increasingly, evidence is coming to light that it is not. Just a few days ago I posted a piece to Doggone Blog about a U.N. program known as LOST. Now another comes to light known as Agenda 21. In both cases the elitists are quietly advancing their plans to redistribute your income, take away your rights, and our nation’s sovereignty.

In a nutshell, Agenda 21 calls for governments to take control of all land use and not leave any of the decision making in the hands of private property owners. It is assumed that people are not good stewards of their land and the government will do a better job if they are in control. Individual rights in general are to give way to the needs of communities as determined by the governing body. Moreover, people should be rounded up off the land and packed into human settlements, or islands of human habitation, close to employment centers and transportation. Another program, called the Wildlands Project spells out how most of the land is to be set aside for non-humans.



Sound familiar?

President Reagan articulated his view of LOST long before he entered the Oval Office, its fatal flaw was as great as it was simple: LOST poses a direct threat to American sovereignty. In a 1978 radio address titled "Ocean Mining," he asserted that "no national interest of ours could justify handing sovereign control of two-thirds of the Earth's surface over to the Third World." He added: "No one has ruled out the idea of a [Law of the Sea] treaty — one which makes sense — but after long years of fruitless negotiating, it became apparent that the underdeveloped nations who now control the General Assembly were looking for a free ride at our expense, again."

It's time that people educate themselves and read the documents and related commentary about both U.N efforts. Unfortunately, their policies have advanced largely unnoticed and we are now in the end game. People need to identify the elected officials who are promoting the U.N.'s policies and hold them accountable for their actions. Only when we've identified who the people are and what they are trying to do will we be able to evaluate whether or not we approve of the policies they are putting forward. Some people may think it's appropriate for agencies outside the United States to set our policies and some people will not. The question is, aren't Americans able to develop their own policies? Should we rely on an organization that consists of member nations that have different forms of governments with agendas not in the best interests of the United States and its citizens? It's time to bring U.N. Agenda 21 and LOST out in the open where we can have these debates and then set our own policies in accordance with our Constitution and Bill of Rights.

No comments: